I can’t help wondering…
Despite the many credible supporters of the “bin Laden did it” theory, why do all of these incredible patriots, intelligence agents and professionals doubt the official story?
The below vid is humorous, to the point and very interesting to me.
-
-
-
-
It makes sense for them to have different opinions. The primary point that never seems to connect with you is that they all cite the impossibility or at least severe improbability of the official story.
I agree that the “official story” credible supporters are interesting.
May goal is to engage in a public, deep, well-funded investigation. Nothing more, nothing less.
-
It makes scenes that people would have different opinions? Then it’s just enough people throwing mud with no cohesion but as long as enough sticks to dirty the wall.
If it could be proven that nanothermite could even be used to melt steal. Or that there was even molten steal. Or that the building fell at free fall speeds. Just one could be proven I would change my mind set. And almost free fall is not free fall. But you don’t think I have seen all the claims of impossible an seen them debunked.
We have talked about this investigation and it sounds simple just saying I want an investigation. But if you could tell me a realistic way to set one up that would make everyone happy ok.
But when I see all these people presenting stuff on the pentagon not being hit by a plan but then I find out they completely left out the numerous eye wittness that saw the impact or peole posting obviously fake videos of the towers just hurts any movement called “truth”
-
-
-
-
-
Also these ladies that more then likely never heard a real explosion in there lives said they heard explosions in a building that was hit by a plan has had a fire ball travel down to the elevator shaft. Many reports of the elevator doors blown open. Even William Rodriguez states seeing man exit the elevator skin burned off. The building wasn’t only damaged at the point of impact. Would they know any different?
But what about eye wittiness that say didn’t assume or believe actually saw a plan fly into the pentagon is so greatly questioned.
Sean Boger, Air Traffic Controller and Pentagon tower chief – “I just looked up and I saw the big nose and the wings of the aircraft coming right at us and I just watched it hit the building.” “It exploded. I fell to the ground and covered my head. I could actually hear the metal going through the building.” The crew, Boger and Spc. Jacqueline Kidd, air traffic controller and training supervisor, prepared for President George W. Bush to arrive from Florida around 12:30 p.m.
-
-
yes, again, I agree there are different credible opinions.
but you act like the thousands of credible dissenters are just fools throwing mud on the wall.
I’d like to see some definitive expositions by Universities and Agencies. Could you cite some please and show the list of “dissenting opinions” with a list of their names and titles?
-
Well when I see them say it would be impossible for the building to fall at free fall speeds when in the very same video shows debri falling faster then the building makes me wonder how that can be possible.
Ok you want the studies by agencies and universities on the collapsing of the towers that’s all. Ok I’ve learned of most by truthers bashing them so there out there. Driving now will when I get back.
Now if truthers will put out there own study that would be great why haven’t they just put out there own paper on what happened?
-
-
-
-
http://forums.randi.org/archive/index.php/t-157761.html
Just interesting others are on my page. Haha and when looking remember AETruth as a wider range of engineers then this count and is international when this count is not.
-
-
-
-
To say that these people are not saying anything is quite the assumation. If it’s such obvious impossible science there’s nothing wrong with saying “oh I don’t think that’s right let’s fix it”. For someone to say that they don’t have to believe in a inside job just talking science. It’s not like it’s 20% it’s .1% and that’s scewed because AETruth is from around the world.
You can’t just assume that it’s so much bigger.
-
-
-
-
-
this is bordering on pointless, again
why do you always bring up the same points?
there are dozens, if not hundreds of credible investigation agencies that are objective, logical and precise. respectable sources on both sides of the debate should meet, discuss and produce agree-to follow up actions.
end of story.
-
- Comment Feed for this Post
So is it a certin theory or arrgument or is it other question so you do?