Our benevolent masters in government have just been caught blatantly spraying radioactive waste on suburban populations in The US. Technically it was zinc-cadmium sulfide. Check the video below for the complete details.
After knowing this fact, we should wonder what other terrible things have been done by the state, and wonder if we should adjust our perceptions of it.
Were these rogue elements or is this a standard policy that modern chemtrail theorists propose is going on until this very day—but on a massive scale?
Government is not reason; it is not eloquent; it is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master. -George Washington
It’s taken me a long time to warm up to “chemtrail theorists.” Largely because it seems that a massive amount of people would be needed to pull off these alleged operations. However, after more digging and seeing first-hand testimony from the “Geoengineer” scientists themselves eschewing the benefits of spraying dangerous chemicals into the atmosphere “to save the planet from global warming,” I cannot logically oppose the theories promoted by anti-chemtrail activists any longer.
The below video Why In The World Are They Spraying? is the follow up to What In The World Are They Spraying? and details a array of dangerous side effects to our planet with an impressive collection of farmers, scientists, and researchers.
If you can control the weather, you control the food, if you control the food, you control billions of dollars worth of commodity derivatives and wield an incredibly powerful weapon over a country’s population—do you know any sociopaths in power that would desire such a tool?
The below article and interview from Dr. Mercola with attorney and author of 11 books on health and finance including Web of Debt, Forbidden Medicine, and Nature’s Pharmacy, Ellen Brown details her experiences, research and knowledge relating to the corrupting forces within the medical establishment and their links to the banking industry.
The article and interview are fact-based and fascinating.
Ellen Brown is a civil litigation attorney who has written 11 books on health and the politics of health, including the Web of Debt: The Shocking Truth About Our Money System (which focuses on the money and banking system itself), and Forbidden Medicine, which traces the suppression of natural health treatment back to the corrupting influences of our financial system.
The below documentary “War On Health” from Gary Null is stacked with MD’s, PhD’s, Attorneys and health experts that detail the serious risks our food supply, medicine and health faces from The FDA and the mega-corporations that influence their policies.
What does your—or your family’s—health mean to you? If the regulators have been bought out, is it worth your time to explore potentially paradigm-shifting evidence credible professionals have assembled?
When you have the facts, you can fortify your mind and body to create a strong, empowered, happy state of being. Without them, you are at the will of those in power, and at serious risk of losing your life and liberty.
Would you believe that the Nazi war criminal who helped build Aushwitz actually authored The United Nations’ international food plan, Codex Alimentaritus? You should, his name was Fritz Ter Meer and his story is detailed in the video.
How about the fact that The FDA doesn’t do all of their own testing, but accept the potentially (obviously?) biased testing results from their pharmaceutical cohorts? Author of Restore the Republic and Constitutional Lawyer Jonathan Emord provides the details of this scheme in the video.
Here’s a fun one: The FDA has been caught punishing fruit growers and retailers for stating their health benefits!
Knowledge is power and we are either growing or dying—life is never neutral. Will you grow today or will you accelerate your death and submit your loved ones to the dangers of your ignorance and the malice of wicked people?
If you care about health and freedom, watch the video, support locally grown, organic food, educate yourself, and take part in the turning of the tide.
PHILADELPHIA (CN) – Merck has known for a decade that its mumps vaccine is “far less effective” than it tells the government, and it falsified test results and sold millions of doses of “questionable efficacy,” flooding and monopolizing the market, a primary caregiver claims in a federal antitrust class action.
Alabama-based Chatom Primary Care sued Merck on Monday, the week after the unsealing of a False Claims Act complaint two relators filed in 2010.
Those relators, Stephen Krahling and Joan Wlochowski, were Merck virologists who claim in their unsealed complaint that they “witnessed firsthand the improper testing and data falsification in which Merck engaged to artificially inflate the vaccine’s efficacy findings.”
Krahling and Wlochowski claimed Merck’s scheme caused the United States to pay “hundreds of millions of dollars for a vaccine that does not provide adequate immunization.”
“As the largest single purchaser of childhood vaccines (accounting for more than 50 percent of all vaccine purchases), the United States is by far the largest financial victim of Merck’s fraud,” according to the 2010 False Claims Act complaint. “But the ultimate victims here are the millions of children who every year are being injected with a mumps vaccine that is not providing them with an adequate level of protection. And while this is a disease that, according to the Centers for Disease Control (‘CDC’), was supposed to be eradicated by now, the failure in Merck’s vaccine has allowed this disease to linger, with significant outbreaks continuing to occur.”
The United States told a federal judge in April that it did not want to intervenein the False Claims case, but reserved the right to do so later.
Chatom says in its antitrust complaint that Merck falsely claims its mumps vaccine is 95 percent effective.
That claim “deterred and excluded competing manufacturers,” who would enter the risky and expensive vaccine market only if they believed they could craft a better product, Chatom says in its complaint.
Merck is the only manufacturer licensed by the FDA to sell the mumps vaccine in United States, and if it could not show that the vaccine was 95 percent effective, it risked losing its lucrative monopoly, according to the complaint.
That’s why Merck found it critically important to keep claiming such a high efficacy rate, the complaint states.
Is is possible?
Check the below vids and decide for yourself.
“What in The World Are They Spraying?!” Official trailer:
To be fair, here’s an apparently credible and deep debunking article.
Efficient, low-price commerce depends on the ability of consumers and businesses to interact freely, competition and the resulting price information. Only a free market of consumers and service providers can create this.
Comment: As both sides of the court maintain their positions, the vaccine debate rages on. The often impressive Dr. Mercola sits down with Dr. Wakefield to discuss the details of his infamous and passionately critiqued paper linking autism to MMR vaccines. A very interesting discussion and a balanced, objective article below.
No matter how mild or extreme your beliefs are on this subject, there is a significant likelihood that if there is any kind of issue in the vaccines, the massive “Big Pharma” money would react against it with counter-punch research.
If you’re pro- or anti-vaccine this interview is fascinating—there is much more to this story. Did you know that Dr. Wakefield is actually PRO vaccine? Or that there are massive conflicts of interest between the scientific publications and their owners?
By Dr. Mercola
In February 1998, the Lancet published Dr. Andrew Wakefield’s case series of a group of autistic children with gastric problems, which has become one of the most controversial studies in medicine because part of the patients’ story included regression after receiving the MMR vaccine.
The debate is a heated one, as the study suggests there may be a link between the MMR vaccine, bowel disease and autism.
In an interview I conducted with Dr. Wakefield in 2010, he said he knew he was about to enter treacherous waters when the study was published, and he expected the inevitable backlash from the vaccine industry.
However, “backlash” is putting it mildly, as Dr. Wakefield’s reputation was completely smeared.
The latest revelations in this controversy add yet another twist, and suggest that a series of articles published by the BMJ in January 2011 alleging that Wakefield falsified data, making the original Lancet article fraudulent, were in fact the inaccurate ones …
New Investigation Defends Wakefield’s Lancet Study
More from Dr. Burk on fluoride and cancer here.
Was fluoride used by Joseph Stalin in Russian gulags to make prisoners more complacent?
Is that same strategy being used today?